In my previous blog post, I covered the first half of Rick Zitelman's presentation to the Technion Entrepreneurship Club on ethics and investing. After concluding his discussion of Jewish business ethics, Rick transitioned to a more general presentation on investing in Israel and investing overall.
"Anne, Kelley, and Don chatting with Rick Zitelman"
Photo by Kristin Thompson
Photo by Kristin Thompson
For many years, Rick has been an investor in companies - as a venture capitalist - as well as a principal advisor to other investors and investment firms. Further, he has been (and currently is) an investor in Israeli companies. As such, he has a wide range of hard won advice to offer to investors - especially those looking to invest in Israel.
In regards to investing in general, Rick offered nine "rules" to live by ...
- There is money and then there is SMART money.
- Smart investors invest in people - passion and potential are critical.
- Remember, it ALWAYS takes longer and costs more.
- It's better to have more capital than less.
- It's better to have a small piece of a big pie, than a big piece of a small pie.
- Protect your IP, but remember, it takes a lot of money and time.
- Play to your strengths and learn to work with your weaknesses.
- There are three types of investors: Lead, Co-, and Passive.
- Valuations are never easy. Take your time and do your homework.
- Investors look for reasons not to invest. Don't let poor communication be why.
- Time differences can play havoc. Be prepared to work odd hours.
- When dealing with America, Shabbat removes a significant portion of the week.
- As a deal develops, it becomes good to have partners in both the US and Israel.
Rick concluded his talk by discussing a final criteria for new ventures in Israel. According to Rick, the Israeli government's Office of Chief Scientist (as well as many other local incubators) offer lucrative sources of early stage financing. However, he indicated that investors and firms should really do their homework before signing onto one of these partnerships, as there are significant pros and cons to following this path. The avenues available for exit can narrow if a firm accepts investment from these entities.